A few years ago my boss at the time got my family a tin of cookies and brownies from a company I never heard of called Cheryl & Co.  It was a special occasion being that my wife and I were blessed with our first daughter.  Those treats were hands-down the best I’ve ever tasted.  Plus, they come individually wrapped to seal in all the goodiness (yes I made this word up).  Since that time, just over three years ago, we have treated others to the scrumptious Cheryl & Co treats for special occasions. 

Recently, we placed an order for someone that lives just up the street for their special occasion.  Just to top off the order, we added a few treats for ourselves and had the whole order shipped to our house.  My wife placed the order and decided to try out a few of the sugar free cookies to see if they were any good.  Plus, with me being a diabetic and all, she was probably just trying to win a few points by looking out for me (wink, wink).

cookies

[source]

I tried the sugar free cookie and it was really good; almost as good as the regular ones, but not quite over-the-top good.  I looked at the nutritional information to find out how many carbs were hiding in these bad boys.  To my astonishment, I found that the sugar free cookies had 20 carbs per cookie and the regular ones only had 17.  The fact that the carbs were higher in a product that claims to be sugar free isn’t a news flash for me.  I found this out a while ago with other products. 

I really believe that there is some false advertisement in these sugar free products.  You would think if they are sugar free, the carb content would be significantly less, right?  Why the heck would I buy sugar free if the carb content is higher?  Well, here’s the answer, I don’t.  I’m not fooled by this gimmick.  Yes, they probably are a little lower in calories, but that doesn’t really concern me.

I know there are different types of sugars and that they can affect your blood sugar in slightly different ways.  But seriously, do you count sugar free carbs differently than regular carbs?  I don’t.  They are all carbs to me.  There is one exception to my rule of passing on sugar free.  When it comes to gum and medicine or hard candy, I always go sugar free. 

Do you try to get the sugar free products or do you pass?  Does this surprise you?

Canadian Pharmacy
Posted in Info, Real Life, Tips, Tony

10 Comments

mygif
Jaclyn Said,
April 6th, 2009 @10:10 am  

It actually surprises me a little that it has more carbs, though if it had the same number, it wouldn’t surprise me. I’ll get the Murray sugar free brand at the store, and they’ll often have the same total carbs as regular cookies, though maybe half of them will be sugar alcohol. Which I suppose is its own issue–sugar alcohols usually get me near the same in the end, they’re just significantly slower–like a few hours.

They probably aren’t lower calorie either though! Or at least, certainly not lower fat! Sometimes those things are worse. Which is just funny. I’ve also noticed that in low fat products will be higher carbs sometimes.

mygif
April 6th, 2009 @10:45 am  

I’m wise to their schemes too. Like you say, it is all marketing, and getting people to believe that it is “SUGAR” they should avoid.

mygif
Jill Said,
April 6th, 2009 @11:59 am  

We don’t buy the sugar free at all. When we went through the nutrition class 2 days after Kacey was diagnosed, we learned about carb counting and how sugar free is NOT carb free. When we compared things like ice cream and cookies, the ones with sugar in them had less carbs. So we were told…why eat the nasty sugar free cookies when you can have the good ones with less carbs…LOL! It’s hard to get other people to understand that Kacey CAN eat regular food and even though they buy her sugar free stuff, I try not to hurt their feelings but show them that it’s not the sugar we’re watching…it’s the carbs :) We also don’t bolus any different. Carbs are carbs and they all get counted the same way unless it’s got more than 5g of fiber and then we subtract.

mygif
Gary Said,
April 6th, 2009 @12:31 pm  

Have to pass on the “Sugar Free” stuff. Such a scam. You have to love getting sugar free candy as a holiday gift. Hey – If you’re going to buy me candy, get me the good stuff! It’s about carbs NOT SUGAR!!

mygif
Rachel Said,
April 6th, 2009 @2:27 pm  

No sugar free for us either. When Tristan was first diagnosed, we tried them. Then realized what a scam it was!!!! I love when I see advertisement suggesting that sugar free is good for diabetic!! It’s diabetic food!! That really gets me going LOL :)

mygif
April 6th, 2009 @10:27 pm  

I thought I would provide a little different perspective here. I review a lot of these “no sugar” products, and it’s not really an all-or-nothing approach I try to take.

Most of the products that have no sugar and a high number of carbohydrate grams use sugar alcohols to achieve sweetness. Not all sugar alcohols are created equal. Some have pretty high glycemic index values, and some have almost no impact on blood glucose. The labels must report the sugar alcohol grams the same no matter what their impact is.

In my experience you can subtract half the sugar alcohol grams from the total carbohydrate gram count for a fairly reliable measure of carbohydrate gram impact. Everyone’s metabolism is different, and this discussion is a good opportunity to point out that consistent testing and experimenting is the best way to determine what snacks are good for you.

mygif
Tony Said,
April 7th, 2009 @8:35 am  

It’s nice to see that I’m not the only one passing on the sugar free foods. When comparing the nutritional information and the actual taste, I’m not sure it’s worth giving up on the “good” stuff for the sugar [taste] free ones.

@Glucoholic – I welcome and appreciate a different perspective. You are absolutely correct according to my research about the sugar alcohols when counting carbs. Again, I’m not sure giving up on the taste is worth the trouble. Thanks for the info and different perspective. According to the American Diabetes Association:

Tips for Carb Counting and Sugar Alcohols

Sugar alcohols don’t raise blood glucose as much as the same amount of other carbohydrates. To figure out the amount of other carbohydrate you should count for a food with sugar alcohols, follow these tips:

* Subtract half of the sugar alcohol grams from the total carbohydrate
* Count the remaining grams

For Example:
Serving Size: 1 bar
Total carbohydrate 15 grams — Sugar alcohol 6 grams
One bar counts as 12 grams carbohydrate (15 – 3 = 12)

mygif
JaimieH Said,
April 7th, 2009 @9:31 am  

I try to avoid sugarfree products as much as possible. They are usually 99% of the time replacing the sugar w/additional fat as well (bad oils too)…sugar alcohols and I don’t agree in general…I get bad stomach cramping etc, even some sugar free gums make me queezy sometimes…

Sugar free label is a crock and it is hard to get people to realize that even though I’m diabetic I don’t buy it…and it really saddens me the newly diagnosed go straight out and buy all the sugar free products they can fill their cupboards with because I did the same many years ago until I realized how terrible they really can be for you…

mygif
Nan Said,
April 23rd, 2009 @10:43 pm  

After my failed attempt at a Splenda-fied cake for my little type 1’s 3rd birthday, I’ve given up the sugar-free idea. (Except for tried and true jello and popsicles!) Our endo doc said just to watch the decadent desserts and limit them but just have the real thing, count carbs best you can and correct. Who knows…they will soon find something wrong with all these sugar-free sweeteners…

mygif
SugarFree Isn't Said,
July 10th, 2009 @11:19 am  

Until they start using tagatosein in place of sugar, and go away from the sugar-alcohol based sweeteners, I won’t touch anything that’s labeled sugar-free.

tagatosein is a left-handed sugar (the molecule is spun opposite to the standard sugar molecule) made from processing whey.

http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.11/newsugar_pr.html

The human body cannot process the sugar, so it passes through the body without effecting it (at most, some human bodies can process as much as 15% of the tagatosein content – still a lot better than 100% of regular sugar).

It is real sugar as far as look, taste, molecular makeup goes – it can be used to directly replace standard sugar. (I’m thinking Pepsi throwback or Mt. Dew Throwback made with tagatosein here).

It hasn’t been processed with chlorine as splenda has, so doesn’t cause the allergic reactions that splenda is known to do.

It doesn’t break down into formaldehyde like nutrasweet does when stored above 70. Nor does it contain the phenolketonurics that nutrasweet does – which can cause all kinds of health problems.

Random Post

Leave Your Comments Below

Please Note: All comments are moderated

Subscribe without commenting